|
Blog para repartir asuntos y noticias de programas favoritas de Ciencia Ficcion, Astronomia y Lectura. Incluye Documentales Factuales en relaccion con estas temas.
Bloody Mosquito Fossil Supports Recent Creation
|
http://www.icr.org/article/7735/ Karl Priest the Insect man http://www.insectman.us Karl (The Insect Man) Priest Play List http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=2017A89796441B37 Thank God for Insects Which Drive Evolutionists Buggyhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y1bq8AmANBk http://www.insectman.us/misc/face-the-facts.htm Life Science Prize http://www.lifescienceprize.org
|
Impact Theory of Moon's Origin Fails
|
http://www.icr.org/article/7736/ *Scientists Speak About the Negative Side of Evolution (*) non-creationists http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xWQaEHTNbOs ICR Articles Play List (200) http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLCF68762818505850 ICR Articles Play List 2http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLCF68762818505850 Creation Moments 1 Play List (196 videos) http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLC063FCB1E9AF0470 Creation Moments 2 Play List (195 videos) http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL1EB554CACA1673A0 Creation Moments 3 Play List (117 videos)http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLC063FCB1E9AF0470 Creation / Evolution 1 Play List (200 videos) http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLC78AB652F6856E5C Creation / Evolution 2 Play List (200 videos) http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLFD4C1442022FFFF2
|
New Human Fossil Borders on Fraud
|
In 2003, Dr. Miles Russell of Bournemouth University published the results of his investigation into Dawson's antiquarian collection and concluded that at least 38 specimens were clear fakes. Russell has noted that Dawson's whole academic career appears to have been "one built upon deceit, sleight of hand, fraud and deception, the ultimate gain being international recognition".
|
Was Mars Earth-like?
|
While Mars Rover Curiosity is studying the Red Planet from the ground, the Maven satellite will give us important data taken from the upper atmosphere. Was Mars ever full of water, and as lush as the forests of Earth? By studying various atomic and molecular processes, Maven will help to decipher the mysterious history of Mars
|
Human-like Fossil Menagerie Stuns Scientists
|
http://www.icr.org/article/7843/ Rocks Aren't Clocks: A Critique of the Geologic Timescale Does the geological column prove that the earth is billions of years old? Is the geological column even a reality? These are questions that are too often assumed as the rock layers are presented as if they self-evidently prove the vast ages that evolutionism requires. Geologist John Reed unravels the geological column in a style that is accessible to laypeople and specialists alike, revealing the philosophical assumptions that are critical to questions about the time scale. This long-overdue, thorough critique of the secular view of prehistory is up-to-date with the latest changes in thinking, and the most recent attempts to overcome its philosophical shortcomings. http://usstore.creation.com/catalog/rocks-arenrsquot-clocks-p-1877.html?osCsid=43f5ur4kfkp2cmmqt45p742ae0
|
1202 - Textbook Deceptions / Did Darwin Murder God? - Chad Kreuzer
|
1203 - Cave Men / Did Darwin Murder God? - Chad Kreuzer
|
For more lectures visit:
http://amazingdiscoveries.tv/c/180/Did_Darwin_Murder_God/ http://amazingdiscoveries.tv/media/1383/1203-cave-men/ In this message, we will look at some of the fabrications that have been designed by the evolutionists to prove their theories. We learn the great fallacy of the dating method they use. We learn about the Nebraska Man and his "wife"--two supposed fossilized beings that are said to provide links in the chain between humanity and animal ancestors. Kreuzer reminds us that if the lie is told over and over again, people begin to believe it. |
1204 - Dating Methods / Did Darwin Murder God? - Chad Kreuzer
|
For more lectures visit:
http://amazingdiscoveries.tv/c/180/Did_Darwin_Murder_God/ http://amazingdiscoveries.tv/media/1384/1204-dating-methods/ In this lecture, we discover that some scientific dating methods have horrible inaccuracies. It's been said that the earth is billions of years old. But how can we know how old something is by just looking at it? Scientists use radiometric dating, wherein radioactivity can be used as a clock to measure the match of geological time. The older the rock, the smaller the ratio of the amount of the radioactive parent to the stable daughter. But this method is based on misled assumptions. An experiment was conducted to prove how old some rocks were from an island that emerged through a volcano less than 100 years ago. It was discovered that the error margin on these rocks was 7,000,000%. How can we assume that this dating method works on things that we don't know the age of, when it clearly doesn't work on the rocks that we do know the age of? |
Suscribirse a:
Entradas (Atom)